Norris v. BELK'S DEPARTMENT STORE OF DUNN, NC, INC.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
Plaintiff appellant asserts that the “sucker stick” covered by tissue paper constituted a hidden danger, this condition had existed in the aisle for thitry-five minutes at least, defendant in the exercise of reasonable care should have discovered and removed the hazard or warned plaintiff of its existence, and by failure to do so defendant is exposed to liability for damages.
It is axiomatic that storekeepers are not insurers of the safety of their customers while on store premises. Copeland v. Phthisic, 245 N.C. 580, 96 S.E. 2d 697. Customers are invitees and the law imposes on storekeepers…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Smith Et Ux. v. Amer. Stores Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Relahan v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Copeland v. PhthisicSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Case v. Cato's of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Shiflett v. M. Timberlake, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Henderson v. St. Francis Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Holland v. MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966