Legal Opinion
State v. Otis
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 11, 2009No. 37705-5-IIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
213 P.3d 613 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Earl Gordon OTIS, Jr., Appellant.
No. 37705-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 11, 2009.
Manek R. Mistry, Jodi R. Backlund, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for Appellant.
Brian Patrick Wendt, Clallam County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Port Angeles, WA, for Respondent.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, J.
¶ 1 At a bench trial on stipulated facts, the trial court found Earl Gordon Otis, Jr. guilty of manufacturing marijuana, contrary to RCW 69.50.401(1). Otis appeals his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred when it granted the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. JanesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Tunstall v. BergesonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Carson v. FineWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. TriWashington Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. AguirreWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. ConstantineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.