Legal Opinion
State v. Aguirre
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 2010No. 82226-3PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
229 P.3d 669 (2010)
168 Wash.2d 350
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Daniel Marshall AGUIRRE, Petitioner.
No. 82226-3.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 29, 2009.
Decided March 4, 2010.
Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Law Offices of Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Carol L. La Verne, Thurston County Prosecutor's Office, George Oscar Darkenwald, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
J.M. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 Daniel Marshall Aguirre appeals his convictions and sentence for assault and rape. Aguirre alleges that the trial court erred by admitting the testimony of the prosecution's expert,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. McCrevenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. KnutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. KNUTZCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.