Legal Opinion

Millgrove School Township v. Peck-Hammond Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1916No. 8,964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Steuben Circuit Court; John W. Baxter, Special Judge. Action by The Peek-Hammond Company against Millgrove School Township and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in appellee’s favor for $1,144.58 in an action brought by it to recover an amount alleged to be due upon a contract for the sale of a heating plant to appellant township. The error relied upon for reversal is “that the court erred in its conclusions of law uppn the special finding of facts”.

An examination of the record discloses that such findings and conclusions of law were announced and filed by the court on February 6, 1914, and, that no exception was taken thereto until February 27, 1914. Section 656 Burns 1914, §626 R. S. 1881, requires that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. State, ex rel. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Radabaugh v. SilversIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Roeder v. KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pritchard v. MinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API