Legal Opinion

Roeder v. Keller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1893No. 16,433PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.

The facts in this case, as found by the court, are briefly:

That on the 8th day of September, 1879, Theodore Roeder, husband of appellant, was the owner and in possession of certain lots, named, in the city of Evans*693ville; that on said day he executed to appellee his promissory note for $465, due in four months after date, with interest at eight per cent, after maturity, which note, on the 19th day of September, 1879, he secured by mortgage on said real estate; that, prior to the execution of said note and mortgage, two judgments had been recovered against said Roeder, which were liens upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Wilson v. BrookshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Epperson v. HostetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Arbogast v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. State, ex rel. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Jones v. MayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Garrick v. GarrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Studabaker v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Grubb v. BrendelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API