Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Beneficial Fire and Casualty Company

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1968No. 11067PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for recovery under an insurance policy, on the ground that plaintiff had not filed his suit within the time required under the terms of the policy. Affirmed with costs to defendant.

From use' of the discov'ery process under' the rules, employed by both sides, the facts appear as follows: On August 8, 1965, some of’ plaintiff’s equipment disappeared resulting in' a loss to plaintiff. Plaintiff orally notified his insurance salesman, thereof. The policy required written no-. tice, and the filing of proof of loss…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William OldenburgCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  3. Anderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Canadian Indemnity Co. v. K & T, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1990
  5. Hibdon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API