Legal Opinion

Canadian Indemnity Co. v. K & T, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided September 17, 1990No. Civ. 90-C-59APublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALDON J. ANDERSON, Senior District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

Both of the defendants have filed separate motions that are now before the court. Defendant General Accident Insurance Company (“General Accident”) has moved for summary judgment, and defendant K & T, Inc. d/b/a Budget Rent-a-Car of Salt Lake City (“Budget”) has made a motion to dismiss alleging that the plaintiff, Canadian Indemnity Company (“Canadian Indemnity” or plaintiff), has failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Because the court finds that the plaintiffs claims are barred by the statute of limitations, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Greenhalgh v. Payson CityUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Becton Dickinson and Co. v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Paul Holt Drilling, Inc., and Paul Holt, an Individual v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tucker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Lang v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. Adamson v. City of Provo, UtahDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
  5. Bridgewaters v. Toro Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API