Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1972No. [No. 298, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

The appellant (Cherry), availing himself of the provisions of Code (1970 Repl. Vol.), Art. 66%, § 7-621, applied to the Superior Court of Baltimore City for permission to bring an action against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Board). This is his appeal from the denial of his application.

Art. 66%, § 7-621 provides in pertinent part as follows:

“Any qualified person, who, after June 1, 1964, suffers damages resulting from bodily injury or death or damage to property caused by an operator or owner whose whereabouts cannot be ascertained * * * may apply to a court of competent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HraskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Diamond v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API