Bicknell v. Van Hellen
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
The receiver of the Bank of Saginaw brought suit against defendants, claiming Russell O. Van Hellen was liable on a renewal note for $14,822 given to the bank and the others were also liable because on May 1, 1930, they jointly and severally guaranteed the payment of the original Van Hellen note of like amount, and renewals thereof. The note on which suit is brought is the ninth renewal of the note given at the time the guaranty was given. Th,e judge correctly decided the simple questions involved' in the case and entered judgment for the full amount claimed with interest against those…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Palmer National Bank v. Van DorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- MacCrone v. EckertMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Nimmo v. SupernawMichigan Supreme Court · 1937