Legal Opinion

Nimmo v. Supernaw

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1937No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 39,318PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In this suit tried without a jury, plaintiff seeks recovery on a promissory note signed by defendants Supernaw and indorsed by defendant Mackey. The' former made no defense, and as to defendant Mackey the circuit judge rendered a judgment of no cause for action. Prom this judgment plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff is the receiver of the Peoples State Savings Bank of East Jordan, a Michigan banking corporation. Both Mr. Supernaw and Mr. Mackey were stockholders in the bank and the latter was a director. In 1928, Supernaw desired to secure a loan of $6,000 with which to purchase Florida real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Palmer National Bank v. Van DorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ortmann v. Canadian Bank of CommerceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. MacCrone v. EckertMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brachman v. Wheelock, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gottesman v. RheinfrankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bicknell v. Van HellenMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API