Nimmo v. Supernaw
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.
In this suit tried without a jury, plaintiff seeks recovery on a promissory note signed by defendants Supernaw and indorsed by defendant Mackey. The' former made no defense, and as to defendant Mackey the circuit judge rendered a judgment of no cause for action. Prom this judgment plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff is the receiver of the Peoples State Savings Bank of East Jordan, a Michigan banking corporation. Both Mr. Supernaw and Mr. Mackey were stockholders in the bank and the latter was a director. In 1928, Supernaw desired to secure a loan of $6,000 with which to purchase Florida real…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Palmer National Bank v. Van DorenMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Ortmann v. Canadian Bank of CommerceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- MacCrone v. EckertMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brachman v. Wheelock, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Gottesman v. RheinfrankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Bicknell v. Van HellenMichigan Supreme Court · 1942