Legal Opinion

MacCrone v. Eckert

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1936No. Docket No. 49, Calendar No. 38,850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an action in assumpsit on a promissory note, given by defendant to plaintiffs. Defendant admits execution of the note but claims it was at the solicitation of plaintiff’s local manager at Flint and upon a verbal agreement that he was not to be held to pay the same.

The issues were tried before the court without a jury and defendant adjudged not liable.

Plaintiffs review by appeal, contending, in substance, that the affirmative defense of want of consideration was not established and the alleged contemporaneous agreement that the defendant would incur no liability was inadmissible.

It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kulenkamp v. GroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Anderson v. EngardMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Taylor v. RugensteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Loyal Order of Moose, Adrian Lodge 1034 v. FaulhaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Malone v. KugelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Nimmo v. SupernawMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Gottesman v. RheinfrankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bicknell v. Van HellenMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API