Friedman v. Prescetti
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, “ George” Prescetti and others, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of July, 1921, denying defendants’ motion to vacate and set aside a warrant of attachment and an order for the service of the summons by publication granted herein.
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
The defendants, appellants, appearing specially for the purpose of the motion only, applied for an order vacating the warrant of attachment and the order for service of the summons by publication heretofore granted herein. The motion to vacate in each case was based upon the insufficiency of the papers to confer upon the court jurisdiction to grant either the warrant or the order for publication of the summons. The motion of the defendants to vacate was denied at Special Term, and they have appealed from the order of the Special Term, continuing their special appearance upon this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Blossom v. . EstesNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- McCracken v. . FlanaganNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kennedy v. . LambNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Ross v. IngersollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosado v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Cole v. Nash Motors Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Rome Trust Co. v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Galbraith v. YancikNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Pitcairn v. PitcairnNew York Supreme Court · 1922