Legal Opinion

United States v. Marquez, Jose

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 24, 2002No. 01-3105PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to revisit the scope of the strict time limit for filing a motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33, a subject we addressed just two years ago in United States v. Hall, 214 F.3d 175 (D.C.Cir.2000). Rule 33 provides that a motion for a new trial based on grounds other than newly discovered evidence must be made within seven days “after the verdict or finding of guilty or within such further time as the court may fix” during that seven-day period. If the defendant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State Oil Co. v. KhanSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Thompson v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. John CanovaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Oruche, SorensonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. Hall, DennisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. HowardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. United States v. Hall, DennisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API