Legal Opinion
Rosenthal v. Vogt
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1991No. B033509PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FUKUTO, J.
Plaintiff, Jerome B. Rosenthal, appeals from three orders of dismissal, entered after the sustaining without leave to amend of demurrers to his first amended complaint, which sought relief on account of allegedly wrongful conduct by defendants in connection with his disbarment proceedings. (See Rosenthal v. State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 612 [238 Cal.Rptr. 377, 738 P.2d 723].) We affirm.
Facts
The defendants-respondents comprise two, separately appearing groups: first, the State Bar of California (Bar) and a number of attorneys who were either Bar employees or members of its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Sepulveda v. Highland Federal Savings & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Freeny v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Colome v. State Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Plymale v. DyerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Torres v. State BarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.