Plymale v. Dyer
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY JUDGMENT DECISION (Doc. 41.)
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants Jerry Dyer (“Chief Dyer”) and Mark Salazar (“Sgt. Salazar”) seek summary judgment in the absence of evi*1080dence to support plaintiff Sean Plymale’s (“Officer Plymale’s”)1 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“section 1981”) discrimination claims arising from an internal affairs (“IA”) investigation in connection with the arrest and charging of a suspect. Officer Plymale’s opposition papers appear to claim that defendants treat Hispanic police officers more favorably than white officers in IA investigations. This Court…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Blackshire v. County of YubaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023