Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Waterway Drive Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of Cedar Point

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2012No. COA12-614Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStroud, Judge

I agree with the majority that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking the John Jones affidavit. I therefore concur in section IV of the majority’s opinion. I must respectfully dissent as to the *558remainder, however, as I believe that the evidence shows that the Town of Cedar Point has expressly accepted the portion of Front Street now part of Waterway Drive and that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether plaintiffs’ withdrawal was effective and whether the Town has acquired a prescriptive easement as to the portion of Waterway Drive outside of the original…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API