Legal Opinion

State v. Curtright

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2002No. S-01-521PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

NATURE OF CASE

James D. Curtright appeals the order of the district court for Lancaster County denying his motion for postconviction relief. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court concluded that trial counsel was not ineffective when he did not file a direct appeal because Curtright had instructed trial counsel not to file such appeal. The district court further determined that the remaining issues raised by Curtright in the postconviction motion were waived because they could have been raised on a direct appeal. We affirm the denial of Curtright’s motion for postconviction relief.

STA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Mark Douglas PoehlmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. State v. HessNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Whiteman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. BecerraNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. PerryNebraska Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API