Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2001No. S-00-1230PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Robert E. Hunt, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his amended postconviction petition. Hunt alleges that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in a postconviction action. We have previously held that Nebraska does not recognize a claim for ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel. But Hunt argues that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-3004 (Reissue 1995) provides a claim for ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel. We affirm because a postconviction claim must be based on a deprivation of a federal or state constitutional right rendering the judgment void or voidable. Section 29-3004…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BurlisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. HuntNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. State v. LotterNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hunt v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API