Legal Opinion

Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 21, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4959PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

This products liability ease involved a collision between a motorcycle and an automobile. The jüry returned a verdict in favor of Jose Cota for $3,500,000 and in favor of his wife, Dorothy, for loss of consortium, in the sum of $175,000. Defendants contend the trial court erred in (1) denying its motion for a mistrial because of jury misconduct; (2) denying its motion to bifurcate the issues of liability and damages; (3) precluding defendants’ use of the defenses of assumption of risk, product misuse and unforeseeable use; (4) limiting the admission of the facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Barbara F. Evans, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Elliott v. VideanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Mulhern v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API