Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This products liability ease involved a collision between a motorcycle and an automobile. The jüry returned a verdict in favor of Jose Cota for $3,500,000 and in favor of his wife, Dorothy, for loss of consortium, in the sum of $175,000. Defendants contend the trial court erred in (1) denying its motion for a mistrial because of jury misconduct; (2) denying its motion to bifurcate the issues of liability and damages; (3) precluding defendants’ use of the defenses of assumption of risk, product misuse and unforeseeable use; (4) limiting the admission of the facts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Barbara F. Evans, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Purcell v. ZimbelmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Law v. Superior Court of State of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
- D'AMARIO v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Elliott v. VideanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Mulhern v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.