Legal Opinion
Mulhern v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 10, 1990No. 2 CA-CV 90-0036PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
On February 14, 1986, Daniel Mulhern, Jr. was shot and killed by Hal Nevitt, a Scottsdale police officer on patrol duty. Plaintiffs filed a complaint for wrongful death, with additional counts by the parents of the deceased against Nevitt, Scottsdale Police Chief Michael Gannon and the City of Scottsdale for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the negligent assignment of patrol duties. The wrongful death claim, based on the alleged negligence of Nevitt, was separated from the other counts and tried by a jury which returned a unanimous…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Tindall v. EnderleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Louis Marsch, Inc. v. Pekin Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Garcia v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Dortch v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Gonzales v. Willis, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.