Brooks v. Tyner
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, Superior Gourt, Muskogee County; Farrwr L. McCain, Judge. Action by John L. Brooks against E. Tyner and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This proceeding was commenced as a suit in equity by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of enjoining the defendants from removing 500 tons of baled prairie hay from a bam at Eram, Olda., belonging to E. Tyner, one of the defendants. It seems that Tyner was engaged in cutting and bailing hay in the Creek Nation, and that Brooks and Martin were dealers in that commodity; that during the early part of the season of 1909, Brooks and Martin made independent contracts with Tyner for the purchase of a large quantity of hay…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Crofoot v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Foster v. RopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jones v. Commercial Investment TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- Fry v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Kennedy v. Beets Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Phelan v. Stock Yards BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Hutchins v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.