Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Gilmore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1931No. 23212. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

— Plaintiff, as payee, brought this action against her son and the latter’s wife to establish, and to recover thereon, two lost promissory notes executed by the defendants. It is alleged that one note, in the amount of fifteen hundred dollars, was made May 12, 1925, and was payable May 12, 1927; that the other note, executed January 15, 1925, was for fifty-five hundred dollars, and was due January 15, 1930; and that each note provided for payment of a reasonable attorney’s fee in the event of suit thereon. Denying the execution of the notes, the defendants by cross-complaint sought to recover…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. EagonWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank of Orange, Va. v. WaughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. McEachern v. Sherwood & Roberts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Commercial State Bank v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Panesko v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API