Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Eagon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1922No. 17402PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holcomb,

-Appellant’s action is upon a promissory note executed by respondents for the sum of $175 and interest and $50 attorney’s fees.

Respondents filed a counterclaim for $300, alleged as due Mrs. Eagon on a sale of seventeen head of cattle sold by the bank for her for $2,250, whereas the bank was not authorized by her oral contract with its agent *587to sell for less than $150 a head, or $2,550 in all. It was also alleged that $2,550 was the only amount the respondents had agreed to accept and the only amount the bank ivas authorized to receiye. Appellant replied, denying any liability on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Union Machinery & Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Buerkli v. Carstens Packing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commercial State Bank v. CurtisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gilmore v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Davis v. BayneWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API