Legal Opinion
Chelsea Hearth & Fireplaces, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 9, 2015No. 15-cv-12240Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING CASE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE
On June 19, 2015, Plaintiff Chelsea Hearth & Fireplaces, Inc, (“Chelsea”) filed a Complaint against its insurer, Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company. (“Scottsdale”), -seeking a. declaratory judgment from this Court declaring that Scottsdale is obligated to defend and indemnify Chelsea for damages it may be held .liable for in an action filed on May 7, 2015 in Wash-tenaw County Circuit- Court by Juerten *544Schweizer for injuries Schweizer claims that he suffered after Chelsea allegedly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, a Michigan and Indiana Corporation v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Cailu Title Corporation, Donald G. Sare, Jr., and Kelly L. SareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.