Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Morgan & Sturdivant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 28, 1954No. 14629PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BORAH, Circuit Judge.

Morgan and Sturdivant brought this action against Swift & Company for damages to .a herd of dairy cows alleged to have been caused from1 eating cotton seed meal which defendant had manufactured and sold to plaintiffs as feed for animals but which was not suitable for that purpose in that it had been allowed to become putrid and unwholesome and contained poison and did poison plaintiffs’ cows. There was a trial before a jury and a verdict for the plaintiffs. From judgment thereon defendant appeals.

On this appeal defendant contends chiefly that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayor of Milledgeville v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  3. Central Railroad v. SennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  4. Tanner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Central Railroad v. CogginSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Susie Parker Nettles and Alvie C. Nettles v. General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Limited and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Louis W. Silverii, Administrator of the Estate of Dominick J. Mash, Deceased v. Wilson Kramer and John W. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  3. Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Frances H. Turner, as Guardian for Frank N. Turner v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API