Legal Opinion
Suelthaus & Kaplan, P.C. v. Byron Oil Industries, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1992No. 61777PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
The Suelthaus & Kaplan law firm sought to recover fees for legal services rendered to its client, Byron Oil Industries, Inc. Client counterclaimed alleging legal malpractice. The trial court dismissed client’s counterclaim for failure to state a cause of action. Pursuant to Rule 74.01(b), it made an express determination that there was no just reason for delay in making the order final for appeal purposes. Client appeals; we reverse and remand.
I. Jurisdiction of Appeal
Before addressing the merits presented by the appeal, we must resolve a jurisdictional question. Law firm…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Bennett v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Y.G. v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Estate of CaldwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- B.L. Jet Sales, Inc. v. Alton Packaging Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- International Division, Inc. v. DeWitt & Associates, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Mitchell v. Village of EdmundsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Collector of Revenue of St. Louis v. Parcels of Land Encumbered by Delinquent Tax LiensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re Foreclosure Liens for Del. Land TaxesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- INTERNATIONAL DIVISION, INC. v. DeWITT AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.