Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Village of Edmundson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1995No. 65532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

Plaintiff, Suzanne Mitchell, claims to have been damaged in the sum of $3,000,000 because her jeep was towed by defendant, Village of Edmundson, from an area she claims was not marked as a “no parking” zone. The trial court dismissed her petition for failure to state a claim. She appeals. We affirm.

In assessing the sufficiency of a petition to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, all properly pleaded facts are assumed to be true, the averments are given a liberal construction, and the petition is accorded all reasonable inferences fairly deductible from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Ernest Allen v. City of KinlochCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. Berkowski v. St. Louis County Board of Election CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Devault v. TrumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  5. Berger v. City of University CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Browning v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State of Misdsouri, ex rel. City of Kansas City, Missouri v. The Honorable Kevin D. Harrell, Judge for the 16th Judicial Circuit of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Missouri Public Entity Risk Management Fund v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2004
  4. Moore v. City of Park HillsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Credit Acceptance Corp. v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API