Legal Opinion

Thornsbury v. Aero Energy

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1995No. 95-SC-173-WCPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

This case comes before us on appeal of an opinion of the Court of Appeals which states as follows:

“BEFORE: EMBERTON, MILLER AND SCHRODER, JUDGES.
“SCHRODER, JUDGE: James G. Thorns-bury (Thornsbury) petitions for a review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board), reversing the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), who awarded Thornsbury retraining incentive benefits (RIB) consistent with the pre-1994 version of KRS 342.732(l)(a). The issue to be determined is whether KRS 342.732(l)(a), as amended by the Kentucky Legislature effective April 4, 1994,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mitee Enterprises v. YatesKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Eastern Coal Corp. v. BlankenshipKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Napier v. Scotia Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Newberg v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Spurlin v. AdkinsKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Breeding v. Colonial Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Meade v. Spud MiningKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Miracle v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
  5. Whitaker Coal Co. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API