Legal Opinion

Miracle v. Riggs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 15, 1996No. 95-CA-0656-WCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWERTON, Judge.

Wetzel Miracle petitions for review of an opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) rendered February 13, 1995, reversing and remanding the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) decision, in which he directed the Special Fund to pay income benefits in accordance with Newberg v. Chumley, Ky., 824 S.W.2d 413 (1992). The Board concluded that KRS 342.120(8), as amended on April 4, 1995, applied retroactively to all claims pending on that date, thus payment by the Special Fund was to be made in accordance with the amended provisions. We agree and affirm.

Miracle was exposed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Thornsbury v. Aero EnergyKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Beth-Elkhorn Corporation v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  4. Newberg v. ChumleyKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bowling v. Special FundKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Duty v. Double Eagle Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Rodgers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Rodgers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Spurlin v. WoodsKentucky Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API