Legal Opinion

Breeding v. Colonial Coal Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1998No. 98-SC-67-WCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

After suffering a heart attack, claimant chose to retire from coal mining in December, 1991. By virtue of his age, he was eligible for and began collecting social security retirement benefits. On December 18, 1995, he filed a claim for a retraining incentive benefit (RIB). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) was persuaded that claimant suffered from category 1 pneumoconiosis. The ALJ noted that the record would not support a finding that claimant’s heart attack rendered him incapable of vocational rehabilitation; however, since claimant was no longer employed, an award…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eaton Axle Corp. v. NallyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Thornsbury v. Aero EnergyKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Wheatley v. Bryant Auto ServiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Smith v. Dixie Fuel Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Stovall v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Magic Coal Co. v. FoxKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Spears v. Carhartt, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Green Coal Co. v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  4. Magic Coal Co. v. FoxKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Zielinski Construction Co. v. BurdenKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API