Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Hogue

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1953No. 33375Published

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, J.

The questions raised on this appeal are (1) whether the Probate Court has jurisdiction of such an action and (2) whether the defendant may take the amount set off to him pursuant to Section 10509-54, General Code, as assets of decedent’s estate exempt from administration.

By reason of our recent decision in In re Estate of Morrison, 159 Ohio St., 285, 112 N. E. (2d), 13, we are of the opinion that the answer to the first question is that the Probate Court does have jurisdiction of such an action. In effect, it is an action which will, to use the language of Section 10501-53, General Code,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Oleff, Admr. v. Hodapp, Gdn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Ohio Water Service Co. v. City of WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Davidson v. Miners & Mechanics Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Kirsheman v. PaulinOhio Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API