Legal Opinion

Kirsheman v. Paulin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1951No. 32191PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The sole question presented is whether the children of an heir designated as such under Section 10503-12, General Code, and who died prior to the execution of the last will and testament of the designator possess a right of inheritance from the latter under Sections 10503-4 and 10504-49, General Code, thereby enabling them to maintain an action to contest the will of the designator.

It is the claim of the plaintiffs that a designated heir stands toward the designator as his child under the statute of descent and distribution (Section 10503-4 [1], General Code), inherits from the designator the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochrel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Flynn v. BredbeckOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Blackwell v. BowmanOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Moore v. Estate of MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  5. Drake v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. In Re Enron Corporation Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  4. In the Matter of Estate of TovreaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Garrett v. Jeep Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API