Legal Opinion

State v. Fitzgerald

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 9, 1989No. 87-2141-C-1; CA A48174Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for the return of his vehicle that was seized at the time of his arrest for possession of a controlled substance. Because the trial court was right, albeit for the wrong reason, we affirm.1

The parties stipulated to the facts in the police report. While patrolling the Jackson County Fairgrounds, the officers saw defendant’s car and five men in the north parking lot. Both of the car’s doors were open, with defendant standing near the driver’s door and the other men standing near the passenger door, between defendant’s car and another car. As…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CurranOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. GlascockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API