Legal Opinion

Hall v. McKinnon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1911No. 1,931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The defendants in error interpose a motion to dismiss the writ of error on the ground that the record was not filed in this court by or before the return day, and the time for filing the record was not extended by the judge who signed the citation, or by a judge of this court, as required by rule 16 of this court (150 Fed. xxix, 79 C.C.A. xxix). The motion is purely technical and without merit.

It appears that Judge Lyons of the District Court of Alaska, Fourth Division, tried the case at Fairbanks, and signed the citation, and, from time to time, made orders *730…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Creede & Cripple Creek Mining & Milling Co. v. Uinta Tunnel Mining & Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Moss v. Riddle & CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Lange v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  5. Kirk v. MeldrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MarachowskyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  3. United States v. Brookshire Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917
  4. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Rundle v. Republic Cement CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API