Legal Opinion

McNulty v. McNulty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 8, 1985No. 377PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This appeal lies from an Order awarding appellee alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and all expenses, including Master’s and stenographer’s costs.

The parties were married in 1979 and after chronic marital discord, separated in 1982. There were no children. In 1979, appellee, who had been working as a full time phlebo-tomist in a local hospital at a salary approximately one-half that of appellant’s, reduced her hours to part time in order to return to school for her B.S. in nursing. Her eventual goal was to undergo two years graduate training as well, in order to become a nurse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Semasek v. SemasekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Ruth v. RuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Hollman v. HollmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Prozzoly v. ProzzolySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Verdile v. VerdileSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Dyer v. DyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Thomson v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API