Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Dyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1988No. 430 and 434PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order awarding alimony pendente lite and permanent alimony to Joette Dyer. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the order of the trial court in part and reverse in part.

The parties to this action were married on March 24,1973 and separated on September 10,1974. During the marriage wife was employed full time earning slightly above minimum wage, while husband worked off and on as a laborer. The parties’ standard of living during this period was below average. Following the separation, wife lost her job and began a series of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Remick v. RemickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Barner v. BarnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Prozzoly v. ProzzolySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Geyer v. GeyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. McNulty v. McNultySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Zullo v. ZulloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Felix v. FelixSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1998
  3. O'Callaghan v. O'CallaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Alston v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Alston v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API