Legal Opinion
Volker Stevin Construction, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 30, 1987No. 86-2641-CIVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER OF FINAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARCUS, District Judge.
“[E]ven as a rose is a rose is a rose, so a truck has been held a truck though the damage was caused by its use in conjunction with a power winch.” 1
This case requires the interpretation of an insurance contract, created by the parties to provide coverage of Plaintiff Volker Stevin Construction, Inc.'s (“Volker Stev-in”) construction equipment. The policy provides coverage by Seaboard Surety Company (“Seaboard”) for certain scheduled construction equipment, as well as other leased or newly acquired equipment. On July 21, 1986,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Casey Enterprises, Inc. And D/B/A Pendley Hills Hardware and Minit Check Grocery, Fite H. Casey, Jr. v. American Hardware Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.