Legal Opinion

Beeson v. City of Palmer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2016No. 7092 S-15018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

John and Xong.Chao Beeson own and live on a property in the Palmer West Subdivision in the City of Palmer. Since they moved to the property in 1985, the Beesons have experienced several flooding incidents on their land. They attribute this flooding to water backing up against Helen Drive, a long-standing two-lane road adjacent tó their property originally built by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough but controlled by the City since 2003. After the City installed a water line under Helen Drive and repaved the road surface in 2005, the flooding became more…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Studley v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Donkel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2026
  3. Kenai Landing, Inc. v. Cook Inlet Natural Gas Storage Alaska, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Studley v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API