Legal Opinion

Studley v. Alaska Public Offices Commission

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2017No. 7148 S-15757PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A self-employed real estate broker ran as a candidate for local elective office. The broker sought a blanket exemption from Alaska’s financial disclosure requirements to avoid reporting his clients’ identities and the income earned from them. The Alaska Public Offices Commission denied the broker’s request and assessed a $ 176 civil penalty for his failure to comply with the candidate reporting requirements. On appeal the superior court upheld the Commission’s ruling. The broker now appeals the superior court’s decision, contending the disclosure…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. DeShongAlaska Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Eberhart v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Club Sinrock, LLC v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Alaska Public Offices Commission v. Donna Patrick, James K. Barnett, and John P. LambertAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Austin Ahmasuk v. Division of Banking and SecuritiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API