Legal Opinion

Sovereign Camp v. De Moraida

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1938No. 6993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Taylor

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The above named parties stipulated in the trial court through their respective attorneys that plaintiff in error “is a fraternal, beneficiary association, having a lodge system, and a representative form of government, and ritualistic work; that it is incorporated under the laws of the State of Nebraska, with its home office in Omaha, Nebraska; that it has a lawful permit to do business in the State of Texas, and is organized for the purpose of carrying on its business solely for the mutual benefit of its members…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bailey v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Adams v. Lasalle Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Castillo v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. American Ins. Co. of Texas v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Railway Mail Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. OlivaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Sovereign Camp W.O.W. v. ShufordTexas Supreme Court · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API