Legal Opinion
Bush v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1983No. 16498-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
Claimant, Aimee E. Bush, suffered a heart attack for which she sought compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
‘ The administrative law judge denied her compensation and she sought review by special action. The Court of Appeals set aside the award. We granted review. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is vacated. Bush v. Industrial Commission, 136 Ariz. 525, 667 P.2d 225 (1983).
The essential facts are that the claimant had more work than she could do and had experienced substantial increases in workload and responsibility in her work as accountant for the Pima…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sloss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- McNeely v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Phelps Dodge Corporation v. CabargaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- Archer v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aranda v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Skyview Cooling Co. v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Aguiar v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.