Legal Opinion

Roth Tool Co. v. Champ Spring Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. Moses N. Sale, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

— In this case portions of a third amended petition filed by the appellant were stricken ont on motion of the respondent in the court below and, on a subsequent motion, the court assessed treble costs against the appellant and dismissed its cause, for the reason that three petitions had been filed by it which had been ruled defective on motions of the respondent and no other petition could be filed. An exception was saved to those rulings, and we think seasonably saved by a proper bill of exceptions, though that point is disputed by the respondent.

To determine whether the dismissal of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spurlock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Harrington's Administrator v. PohlmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Tupelo v. StonumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. State ex rel. Oliver Hast Auction Co. v. GrimmMissouri Court of Appeals · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API