Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harrington's Administrator v. Pohlman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended petition, *445and rendered judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff for treble costs under the following provision of the Revised Statutes of 1889:

Section 2068. “If a third petition, answer or reply be filed and adjudged insufficient as above, or the whole or some part thereof be stricken out, the party filing such pleading shall pay treble costs; and no further petition, answer or reply shall be filed, but judgment shall be rendered.”

•Preceding sections of the statute refer to an adjudication of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beardslee v. MorgnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. Spurlock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. Thornton v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. Harrington v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roth Tool Co. v. Champ Spring Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API