Legal Opinion

Bank of Tupelo v. Stonum

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, P. J.

— Plaintiff seeks to recover the amount of a draft of $315.50 which it is alleged was cashed by plaintiff for defendant, payment on which had been refused. What is alleged to be the third amended petition filed by plaintiff was held bad on demurrer and plaintiff put out of court on a motion by defendant for judgment under the. provisions of section 1252, Revised Statutes 1919. Plaintiff appealed.

The only questions involved here are whether the court was right in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended petition, and if right on that question, whether the provisions of section…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Shoe Machinery Co. v. RamloseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. McDonald v. Bankers Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. Spurlock v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  4. British-American Portland Cement Co. v. Citizens Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Antonelli v. BasileMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wellston Trust Co. v. Am. Surety Co. of N.Y.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Parsons v. BarryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API