Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Michel
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 26, 2007No. 06 C 3166PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought this civil action alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 by Defendants Matthew Roszak (“Roszak”), Darrin Edgecombe (“Edgecombe”), Douglas Jozwiak (“Jozwiak”), Trifon Beladakis (“Beladakis”) and Mark Michel (“Michel”). (R. 1, Compl.1ffl 1-5.) The same day the complaint was filed, Roszak, Jozwiak, Be-ladakis and Edgecombe all waived service and consented to entry of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc. And Robert E. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SteffesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. McGeeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. BerrettiniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CarrollDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SchvachoDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.