Legal Opinion

Hammond Bag & Paper Co. v. Bag & Machine Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided April 5, 1932No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

NIELDS, District Judge.

This is an action at law to recover threefold damages under the Clayton Anti-Trust Act § 4 and Sherman Anti-Trust Act § 7 (15 USCA § 15), alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff.

The matter now before the court is defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars in such an action. The Conformity Act (28 USCA § 724) and the state eases do not deprive the federal court of the right to exercise its discretion in the matter. Upon the authority of Locker v. American Tobacco Co. (D. C.) 194 F. 232; Alaska S. S. Co. v. Katzeek, 16 F.(2d) 210 (C. C. A. 9); and Harry…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alaska S. S. Co. v. KatzeekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Locker v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  3. Harry Prochaska, Inc. v. Consolidated Lithographing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API