Legal Opinion
Harry Prochaska, Inc. v. Consolidated Lithographing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 16, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I deny requests for particulars mentioned in paragraphs Nos. 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11a, 11b, 12, and 18 of the motion papers.
I grant the request for particulars with regard to the damages suffered by the plaintiffs mentioned in paragraphs Nos. 11c, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 a and b, and 19 of the motion papers.
I. This is an action at law brought under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 USCA §§ 1-7,15) alleging a conspiracy in restraint of trade by the several defendants, and involves a claim for a recovery of triple the amount of damages suffered by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- American Can Co. v. Ladoga Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Locker v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Locker v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1940
- Hammond Bag & Paper Co. v. Bag & Machine Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932