Low v. Mills
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus to vacate order setting aside service of sub-, poena arid subsequent proceedings in foreclosure case. .The facts are stated in the opinion and head-notes.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
Relators file their petition, and ask for a mandamus to compel the circuit court for the county of Kalamazoo to vacate an order made upon the chancery side of the court, based upon the petition of the defendant, setting aside and vacating a decree in the cause above entitled, and all proceedings therein subsequent $o the issue of the subpoena. The showing made by the defendant, -Hill, in his petition was as follows:
1. That on January 28, 1885, complainants filed their bill to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant to secure the paj'ment of five promissory notes payable to Oliver C. Hill…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Millspaugh v. McBrideNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Johnson v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Brewer v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Creveling v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Maynard v. PereaultMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Vaughan v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Foster v. TalbotMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Serrano v. BerdielSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.