Creveling v. Moore
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from St. Joseph. Foreclosure. Defendants appeal from ah order denying a motion to set aside the decree. ■ ^
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
Decree in this case was entered May 26, 1877, after order pro confesso on personal service of process. On the first day of May, 1878, the defendants filed a petition that the decree and order pro confesso be set aside on the following grounds:
1. That the subpoena issued and served upon them was signed by the deputy register in his own name, and not in the name of his principal.
2. That by the subpoena the defendants were called in to answer to the bill of complaint of “Nelson Creveling, of Minnie J. Boudman,” whereas the decree is in favor of Nelson Creveling, guardian of Minnie J. Boudman.
3.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Lee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Low v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Rucker v. Tabor & AlmandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Serrano v. BerdielSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.