Rumble, Inc. v. Google LLC
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RUMBLE, INC., Case No. 21-cv-00229-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 32 10 GOOGLE LLC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s partial motion to dismiss and motion to strike, 14 briefing for which is complete. See Dkt. No. 32 (“Mot.”), 44 (“Opp.”), 45 (“Reply”). Defendant 15 asks the Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s tying and search-dominance theories of liability and strike 16 paragraphs 34, 35, and 75-176 of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. See Mot.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.